blog view

From on-site to hybrid: The shift employers must adapt to in the GCC

4 min read5,434 ViewsLast updated 26 Dec 2025

A recent Naukrigulf poll shows how nuanced the region’s view on flexibility really is: 46% prefer fully on-site roles, 23% want structured flexibility, 18% prefer fully remote, and 13% favour a 2–3 day hybrid model.

Even though nearly half still prefer on-site work, a sizable share expects some form of flexibility. That creates a gap between candidate expectations and many company policies in the Gulf.

Table of Contents

  1. Why candidates ask for flexibility
  2. Why employers still push on-site
  3. The hiring impact
  4. What candidates really want
  5. Practical steps recruiters can use


Why candidates ask for flexibility

  1. Pandemic experience reshaped habits: During the pandemic, employees across the GCC worked fully remotely — and for many organisations, it worked well. Productivity remained strong, teams adapted quickly, and employees became comfortable with the freedom and rhythm of working from home. This shift has stayed with them. Many now see remote or hybrid setups as normal, not exceptional.
  2. Cost and time pressures. Commuting costs, childcare, and long travel times make flexibility attractive.
  3. Productivity and focus. Many roles require deep, uninterrupted work that employees feel is easier at home sometimes.
  4. Gen Z is reshaping demand. Younger professionals entering the workforce place strong value on work-life balance and flexibility. Employers that ignore this risk losing emerging talent.

The poll numbers above show the actual mix: nearly half want on-site stability, but more than half the market wants at least some flexibility or remote option.


Why employers still push on-site

  1. Culture and supervision: Many GCC organisations prioritise visibility and in-person collaboration.
  2. Training and nationalisation needs: On-site work simplifies mentorship, supervision, and integration for local talent initiatives.

  3. Operational limits: Some processes, security rules, or sector requirements work better in person.

  4. Management comfort: Some leaders still equate presence with productivity.


The hiring impact

  • Roles marked “strictly on-site” may attract fewer candidates in knowledge functions.
  • Candidates delay decisions or reject offers when flexibility is missing.
  • Recruiters end up spending time convincing candidates instead of assessing fit.
  • Companies that offer some flexibility see faster responses and higher acceptance rates.


What candidates really want

Most are not demanding full remote work. They want:

  • A mix of office and home time (even if limited),
  • Clear expectations about where and when to work,
  • Flexibility around start/end times or occasional remote days,
  • Visible workplace culture and career pathways.

The combined share asking for any flexibility (remote + flexible + hybrid) signals a strong market for moderate options.


Practical steps recruiters can use (without changing policy)

  1. Reframe on-site value early: Explain mentorship, fast learning, and visibility benefits.

  2. Offer small, meaningful flexibility: Examples: one remote day a month, flexible hours, or task-based remote work.

  3. Use role-based rules: Allow flexibility for functions that can deliver outputs remotely.

  4. Measure outcomes, not hours: Focus on results to ease managerial concerns.

  5. Communicate clearly from the first call: Avoid late surprises that cause drop-offs.

  6. Showcase your workplace visually: Use your employer branding (company page, photos, culture highlights) so candidates see why on-site matters.

The Gulf market still values on-site work, but a significant slice of candidates now expect flexibility. Recruiters who offer modest, well-defined options and clearly explain the benefits of on-site presence will attract more and better applicants. Small changes—flex hours, occasional remote days, clear role rules—can close the gap and strengthen hiring outcomes.

 

Related articles

NEW

Why candidates rarely share their true concerns

During hiring conversations, candidates often appear agreeable, positive, and aligned — even when they have reservations. Emp...

Read more

2 min read23 Mar 2026

post view

NEW

The shift from hustle to sustainable performance

Hustle culture was once seen as a competitive advantage.Working longer hours, moving faster, and pushing teams harder often h...

Read more

3 min read81 Views20 Mar 2026

post view

NEW

Is hustle culture driving your best employees away?

Some of the most ambitious employees are often the hardest to retain.They take on additional responsibilities, work longer ho...

Read more

4 min read60 Views19 Mar 2026

post view